Up and running on the Alpha Blog Engine!

As I wrote in a post back in October, I’ve been writing my own blog engine, with the plan to run my blog on that instead. And today, finally, I was able to migrate my blog to my own blog engine, called Alpha! It took a little longer than I had hoped (the Devil is in the details…), and there are still lots of things I want to do on it, but it seems to work nicely, and I’m pretty happy with it!

A quick overview of the Alpha Blog Engine:

It’s built to be the perfect blog platform for a technical blogger, assuming that you can run it on a Windows Server, that is. Making it able to run on Mono is on my to-do-list, though.

If anyone is interested, the source is available on bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/nahojd/alpha/overview

Getting Ruby on Rails to work on Ubuntu 10.10

UPDATE 2012-01-25 These instructions are now deprecated, as I’ve written an updated post on how to get Ruby on Rails working on Ubuntu 11.10.

UPDATE 2011-06-21 – I noticed that the install script at beginrescueend.com has changed. I have updated this post to reflect this.

Since I’m still on parental leave, and just have too much god damn time on my hands, I thought I’d finally give Ruby on Rails a good try, so first I finished Rails for Zombies, and then I started on the Ruby on Rails Tutorial (and by the time I’ve finished that, I’ll have come up with something to build). Since Rails feels kind of Linux-ish, and I like working in Linux anyway (despite being a .NET developer), I jumped at the chance of using my Ubuntu 10.10 installation for this.

To my surprise, however, this proved quite the challenge. It turns out that Ubuntu only has built in support for Ruby 1.8.7, and naturally I wanted to use 1.9.2. So, since I’ll have to do this on at least one other computer, and probably again, as I regularly reinstall my computers, I thought I’d post the steps I used to get everything working. Possibly someone else might find this useful, as well.

Note, everytime I start some code with the $ sign, it represents a prompt.

1 - Prerequisites

First of all, it’s a good idea to install some prerequisites, that will be needed anyway:
$ sudo apt-get install vim-gnome curl git git-core libxslt-dev libxml2-dev libsqlite3-dev

Technically, gvim (vim-gnome) is not a prerequisite, but it’s still nice to have! Some of these you might already have installed, in that case, congratulations.

2 - Install RVM

The first thing you want to do is to install the Ruby Versioning Manager, or RVM. I basically followed the instructions on the Installing RVM page, but these are the steps I took:

  1. $ bash < <( curl http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/releases/rvm-install-head ) <— Does not work anymore!
    $ bash < <(curl –sk https://rvm.beginrescueend.com/install/rvm)
  2. Make some changes in .bashrc:
    Add to the end: [[ -s "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm" ]] && source "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm"
    Change the line that reads [ -z "$PS1" ] && return to if [[ -n "$PS1" ]] ; then
    Add before the row you added to the end (on it’s own row): fi
  3. Restart the terminal, or just run $ source "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm
  4. Check that rvm works, run $ type rvm | head -1. You should get the result “RVM is a function”
  5. It might be a good idea to run $ rvm notes, just to make sure everything is fine and you haven’t missed anything so far.

3 - Install Ruby 1.9.2 with RVM

  1. $ rvm package install openssl
  2. Time to install Ruby 1.9.2!
    $ rvm install 1.9.2 --with-openssl=$HOME/.rvm/usr
    Note: The openssl stuff is not needed for rails to work, but if you want to use Heroku to publish your stuff, you’ll need it, so might as well install it right away!
  3. $ rvm --default use 1.9.2

4 - Install RubyGems

Dowload RubyGems from rubyforge.org and unzip it. Then run ~/rubygems-1.5.2$ ruby setup.rb.

5 - Install Rails

Ok, final step. Run $ gem install rails to install Rails. This takes a little while, but when it’s done everything should work. You can check that everything works by creating a new rails application in a directory of your choice: $ rails new test_app, or just jump to “The first application” chapter in the Rails Tutorial.

And yeah, some of these steps might not actually be necessary, or may break your computer. Also, these steps installs RVM, Ruby and Rails only for the current user, not system-wide.

An even simpler way not to send email

I thought this was to simple to blog about, but then I read this post by my colleague Daniel Saidi, and I thought “what the hell”.

Yes, when developing web applications you very often need to send emails. But during development, or testing for that matter, you often don’t actually want to send any emails. You could, of course, go the interface-injection-way, as in Daniel’s post. But there is actually an even easier way, build into .NET. Just edit the config for system.net/mailsettings.

Normally, your outgoing mail settings look something like this

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
<system.net>
<mailSettings>
<smtp deliveryMethod="Network">
<network host="smtp.server.com" port="25" />
</smtp>
</mailSettings>
</system.net>

Now, if you don’t want to send any emails, just change them to use a pickup directory instead.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
<system.net>
<mailSettings>
<smtp deliveryMethod="SpecifiedPickupDirectory">
<specifiedPickupDirectory pickupDirectoryLocation="c:\temp\email"/>
</smtp>
</mailSettings>
</system.net>

And voilà, instead of sending email, you emails gets saved in a directory of your choice instead, which means that you could for example inspect the actual emails in your tests, and for you debug config just drop them in a directory that is automatically cleaned on every build. And for you deploy config, you just use the normal Network delivery method again. Piece of cake!

Progress on the new blog engine

Hmmm, it seems that I did not manage to replace Subtext with my new blog engine, Alpha, before the end of 2010 as I optimistically thought when I started in October. It turns out that there are other things to do than to program when you’re on paternal leave (ya, rly!)

I am, however, making progress with it. It basically displays the posts as I want it to, and the tagging and the tag cloud is working. What I really need to do in order to replace Subtext is to get Alpha to work with Windows Live Writer, since I use that to write all my posts. There are also other small things, like pingbacks/trackbacks, the RSS feed and an archive. The devil is, as always, in the details. So I won’t wager a prognosis for when it’s done this time.

I must say, though, that it’s a joy to work with RavenDB as a database, and I’ll hate going back to work with relational databases when my leave is over. What are the odds I can convince everyone at work (including customers) to work only with document databases from now on? I’ll try to write some posts on my experiences with document databases in general and RavenDB in particular in the near future.

I also enjoy working with Mercurial and Bitbucket for versioning control, and I don’t even need Visual Studio integration, since there are no checkouts! Don’t miss TFS one bit!

Happy New Year!

Dependency injection in ASP.NET MVC 3 got a lot simpler

In my project of writing my own blog engine, I’m using ASP.NET MVC 3 beta, and I like what they have done to simplify the dependency injection! Let me show you the difference.

The MVC 2 way

First, I need a registry (that’s just ScructureMap, nothing really to do with MVC).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
//The most simple registry I could think of
public class AlphaRegistry : Registry
{
public AlphaRegistry()
{
Scan( x =>
{
x.AssembliesFromApplicationBaseDirectory();
x.WithDefaultConventions();
} );
}
}

Then, in MVC 2, you needed to make your own ControllerFactory (actually, you could get this from the MvcContrib project, if it was up to date):

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
public class StructureMapControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
protected override IController GetControllerInstance( RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType )
{
if (controllerType == null)
return base.GetControllerInstance( requestContext, controllerType );

IController result = null;
try
{
result = ObjectFactory.GetInstance( controllerType ) as Controller;
}
catch (StructureMapException)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine( ObjectFactory.WhatDoIHave() );
throw;
}
return result;
}
}

And finally, you needed to replace the default ControllerFactory with the StructureMapControllerFactory:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
public class MvcApplication : HttpApplication
{
protected void Application_Start()
{
//Other stuff that need to be done on application start here

ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory( typeof( StructureMapControllerFactory ) );
}
}

Not the most difficult thing in the world, but still some amount of work.

The MVC 3 way

Ok, what do you do in MVC 3? First of all, we still need our Registry, since that is how we setup StructureMap. But we don’t need our ControllerFactory at all! Instead, MVC 3 introduces a DependencyResolver with 3 methods:

1
2
3
4
public static void SetResolver(IDependencyResolver resolver);
public static void SetResolver(object commonServiceLocator);
public static void SetResolver(Func<Type, object> getService,
Func<Type, IEnumerable<object>> getServices);

So, instead of creating a ControllerFactory, you can create a DependencyResolver, which is more general, and only needs two simple methods: GetService and GetServices. However, an even easier way to do it, which I like, is to use the last overload. So, in Application_Start, we get:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(
t =>
{
try { return ObjectFactory.GetInstance( t ); }
catch { return null; }
},
t => ObjectFactory.GetAllInstances<object>().Where( s => s.GetType() == t )
);

And that’s all we need! And anywhere that MVC needs to resolve a dependency it will use this. And if it fails to resolve (i.e. returns null), it will just fall back to the default way. Me like!

I’m gonna build my own blog engine, because it’s never been done before, or maybe I can just do it better!

Today is the first day of my paternity leave, I’ll be home with my little daughter for at least six months. Which is great! But I immediately started to get the itch to write some code. I needed a hobby project. Since I suck at coming up with great ideas, I decided to be a good Jedi and build my own blog engine!

Yes, I know, there really is no need for another blog engine. Except that there is. The one I would like to use doesn’t seem to be out there. Also, it seems like a perfect way to try out some new technology that I’ve been wanting to use, without a client (or a manager) having opinions about it. And since I replaced the native comments of Subtext with Disqus a few weeks ago, I realized that there really aren’t that many features needed for a blog anymore.

So, my plan right now is to build it on ASP.NET MVC 3, with the Razor view engine. I’ve been wanting to try this whole NoSQL-thing for a while, so I’ll use RavenDB for persistence. I’ve also been wanting to try a distributed version control system (getting reeaaally tired of TFS!), so I’ll use Mercurial and host it on bitbucket. I’m sure I’ll think of other sweet stuff to use as well, and maybe I’ll change my mind on some of these along the way.

But now it’s on it’s way. I called the project “Alpha”, because that’s what it’ll always be. But I aim to replace Subtext with Alpha before the end of this year. And hopefully the process of building it will give me reasons to write some blog posts, since I will not be writing blog posts about the process of taking care of my daughter.

Anyway, the project is available at https://bitbucket.org/nahojd/alpha/overview. Not much to see yet, though.

Extension methods are teh shit!

I’m really starting to like extension methods! I must admit I was a bit sceptical at first when they appeared in C# 3.0 (wow, that was 3 years ago!). I was worried that they would make the code hard to follow, and thought that you could just make a static helper class instead (which is, after all, what extension methods really are).

1
2
3
4
5
//After all, what's wrong with this?
cleanString = StringHelper.RemoveHtml(htmlString);

//On the other hand, this does look nicer...
cleanString = htmlString.RemoveHtml();

So at first, I didn’t use it for much, but now I’ve really started to like it, and I find myself extract anything that operates on classes I can’t change to extension methods. For example, don’t you hate that you can’t use Action.ForEach on IEnumerable? Don’t worry, there’s an extension for that:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
public static void ForEach<T>( this IEnumerable<T> enumeration, Action<T> action )
{
foreach (var item in enumeration)
{
action( item );
}
}

And the ugly !string.IsNullOrEmpty(someStringThatMayBeNullOrEmpty)? Well, how about

1
2
3
4
5
6
public static bool IsNullOrEmpty(this string @string, bool trim = false)
{
if (@string == null)
return true;
return String.IsNullOrEmpty(trim ? @string.Trim() : @string);
}

And suddenly you can call it like this instead: !someStringThatMayBeNullOrEmpty.IsNullOrEmpty(). And yes, this works even if the string is null, since you’re not actually calling a method on the string object, but rather a static method with the string as a parameter!

I’m also very fond of a generic extension that lets me parse strings to enums with an optional fall-back value if the string doesn’t parse: enumString.ParseToEnum<MyEnum>(MyEnum.DefaultValue). I expect that if this keeps up, all logic will be in extension methods by the end of the year.

For some reason, my colleagues thought that I went a bit to far with this one:

1
2
3
4
public static bool ContainsSomething( this string str )
{
return !str.IsNullOrEmpty();
}

But I think they’re just jealous.

Update: Fixed some bad formatting…

Testing EPiServer sure takes a lot of mocking…

A quick follow up to my last post. Even with EPiAbstractions, testing takes a lot of mocking and setup code…

Testing this

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
public void CreateOrtkoppling( int verksamhetsId )
{
var ortContainer = GetOrtContainer() ?? CreateOrtContainer();

CreateVerksamhetPage( ortContainer, verksamhetsId );
}

public PageData GetOrtContainer()
{
return (from p in _dataFactory.GetChildren( _page.PageLink )
where p.PageName == OrtContainerPageName
select p).SingleOrDefault();
}

private void CreateVerksamhetPage( PageData ortContainer, int verksamhetsId )
{
var verksamhet = _verksamhetRepository.Get( verksamhetsId );
if (verksamhet == null)
throw new ArgumentException( "Det finns ingen verksamhet med id " + verksamhetsId );

var page = _dataFactory.GetDefaultPageData( ortContainer.PageLink, OrtPageTypeId );
page.PageName = string.Format( "{0}, {1}", verksamhet.Ort, verksamhet.Besöksadress );
page.Property[VerksamhetsIdProperty].Value = verksamhetsId;
_dataFactory.Save( page, EPiServer.DataAccess.SaveAction.Publish, EPiServer.Security.AccessLevel.NoAccess );
}

took me this much code:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
private Mock<IDataFactoryFacade> dataFactoryMock;
private Mock<IVerksamhetRepository> verksamhetRepositoryMock;
private Mock<PagePropertyUtils> pagePropertyUtilsMock;
private Mock<IPageReferenceFacade> pageReferenceMock;
private PageData utbildningsPage;
private UtbildningPageHandler utbildning;

[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
int utbildningsPageId = 4711;
utbildningsPage = CreatePageDataObject( "Testutbildning", utbildningsPageId );
verksamhetRepositoryMock = new Mock<IVerksamhetRepository>();
pagePropertyUtilsMock = new Mock<PagePropertyUtils>();
pageReferenceMock = new Mock<IPageReferenceFacade>();
dataFactoryMock = new Mock<IDataFactoryFacade>();
dataFactoryMock.Setup( d => d.GetPage( It.Is<PageReference>( p => p.ID == utbildningsPageId ) ) )
.Returns( utbildningsPage );
utbildning = new UtbildningPageHandler( dataFactoryMock.Object, verksamhetRepositoryMock.Object, pagePropertyUtilsMock.Object,
pageReferenceMock.Object, utbildningsPageId );
}

private int MockOrtContainerPage()
{
var pageName = GetPrivateField<string>( utbildning, "OrtContainerPageName" );
int containerPageId = 17;

var containerPage = CreatePageDataObject( pageName, containerPageId );

dataFactoryMock.Setup( d => d.GetChildren( It.Is<PageReference>( p => p.ID == utbildningsPage.PageLink.ID ) ) ).Returns(
new PageDataCollection( new List<PageData> {
containerPage
} )
);
return containerPageId;
}

protected static PageData CreateDefaultPageDataObject()
{
var page = new PageData();
page.Property.Add( "PageName", new PropertyString() );
var propertyPageReference = new PropertyPageReference( PageReference.EmptyReference );
SetPrivateField<Guid>( propertyPageReference, "_pageGuid", Guid.NewGuid() );
page.Property.Add( "PageLink", propertyPageReference );
page.ACL = new EPiServer.Security.AccessControlList();
return page;
}

protected static T GetPrivateField<T>( object o, string fieldName )
{
Type type = o.GetType();
BindingFlags privateBindings = BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static;
FieldInfo match = type.GetField( fieldName, privateBindings );
if (match != null)
{
return (T)match.GetValue( o );
}
return default(T);
}

[Test]
public void CreateOrtkoppling_Will_Create_Page_And_Save_VerksamhetsId_As_Property()
{
var containerPageId = MockOrtContainerPage();
var verksamhet = new Verksamhet { Id = 17, Besöksadress = "Gatan 1", Ort = "Staden", Postadress = "123 45" };
verksamhetRepositoryMock.Setup( v => v.Get( verksamhet.Id ) ).Returns( verksamhet );
var defaultPageData = CreateDefaultPageDataObject();
var propertyName = GetPrivateField<string>( utbildning, "VerksamhetsIdProperty" );
defaultPageData.Property.Add( propertyName, new PropertyNumber() );
var ortPageTypeId = 19;
pagePropertyUtilsMock.Setup( p => p.GetPropertyValue<int>( It.IsAny<PageReference>(), "UtbildningsOrtPageType" ) ).Returns( ortPageTypeId );
dataFactoryMock.Setup( d => d.GetDefaultPageData( It.Is<PageReference>( p => p.ID == containerPageId ), ortPageTypeId ) )
.Returns( defaultPageData );
dataFactoryMock.Setup(d => d.Save(defaultPageData, EPiServer.DataAccess.SaveAction.Publish, EPiServer.Security.AccessLevel.NoAccess))
.Callback<PageData, EPiServer.DataAccess.SaveAction, EPiServer.Security.AccessLevel>( ( pageToSave, saveAction, accessLevel ) =>
{
var id = (int)pageToSave.Property[propertyName].Value;
Assert.That( id, Is.EqualTo( verksamhet.Id ) );
Assert.That( pageToSave.PageName, Is.EqualTo( string.Format( "{0}, {1}", verksamhet.Ort, verksamhet.Besöksadress ) ) );
} );

utbildning.CreateOrtkoppling( verksamhet.Id );

dataFactoryMock.VerifyAll();
verksamhetRepositoryMock.VerifyAll();
}

Now, most of that code (everything except for the actual test) is reused in other tests, but still! It’s a bit exhausting!

Unit testing saving pages in EPiServer CMS 6

I’ve been working quite a lot with EPiServer in the last six years or so, and unit testing has always been a pain in the ass (not that I was writing unit tests anyway six years ago, I hardly knew what I was doing back then… can’t believe I actually got paid! :-)). And it still is, even in the latest version.

Luckily there are some EPiServer developers that are either smarter than me, or just have more free time, for example Joel Abrahamson who has created a wrapper project, EPiAbstractions, for wrapping the unmockable EPiServer classes in mockable classes and interfaces. Wonderful!

We started using this in our current project recently, and mostly it works fine. Instead of using EPiServer.DataFactory inside our business classes, we now inject IDataFactoryFacade from EPiAbstractions, and use that instead. Like this:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
//Old way
public class Foo
{
public PageData GetPageById(int id)
{
return EPiServer.DataFactory.Instance.GetPage(
new PageReference(id));
}
}

//New way
public class Foo
{
private IDataFactoryFacade dataFactory;

public Foo(IDataFactoryFacade dataFactory) {
this.dataFactory = dataFactory;
}

public PageData GetPageById(int id)
{
return dataFactory.GetPage(new PageReference(id));
}
}

Simple enough, it let’s us mock the DataFactory with Moq, and we can use an IoC container like StructureMap to inject the the DataFactory class, or we can create a constructor overload that uses DataFactoryFacade.Instance.

The problem

So, with all these nice interfaces that we are able to mock, what is the problem? Well, I was trying to write a test for this method:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
public void SetAnmälanTillåten(int verksamhetPageId, bool anmälanTillåten)
{
var page = _dataFactory.GetPage(new PageReference(verksamhetPageId));
if (page == null)
return;

var writeablePage = page.CreateWritableClone();
writeablePage.Property["TillåtAnmälan"].Value = anmälanTillåten;
_dataFactory.Save(writeablePage, EPiServer.DataAccess.SaveAction.Publish, EPiServer.Security.AccessLevel.NoAccess);
}

This is a pretty simple method, it gets a page from the DataFactory, sets a property, and saves it again. So we just need to mock GetPage and Save, right? I tried it, and I got this error:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
The type initializer for 'EPiServer.Web.PermanentLinkMapStore' threw an exception.
System.TypeInitializationException
EPiServer.Web.PermanentPageLinkMap Find(EPiServer.Core.PageReference)
System.Guid get_GuidValue()
EPiServer.Core.PropertyData CreateWritableClone()
EPiServer.Core.PropertyDataCollection CreateWritableClone()
EPiServer.Core.PageData CreateWritableClone()

GetPage was mocked like this (somewhat simplified):

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
var page = new PageData();
page.Property.Add( "PageName", new PropertyString( "Name" ) );
page.Property.Add( "PageLink", new PropertyPageReference(
new PageReference( 4711 ) ) );
page.Property.Add( "TillåtAnmälan", new PropertyBoolean() );
dataFactoryMock.Setup( d => d.GetPage(
It.Is<PageReference>( p => p.ID == 4711 ) ) ).Returns( page );

So, what is the problem? Well, a look inside EPiServer.dll told me that when calling CreateWriteableClone for the PageData object, it in turn calls CreateWriteableClone for each property in the PropertyDataCollection. When it comes to the PageLink property, it calls PropertyPageReference.CreateWriteableClone:

PropertyPageReference.CreateWriteableClone() implementation from EPiServer CMS 6

This doesn’t look so bad, does it? But the problem is in this.GuidValue:

PropertyPageReference.GuidValue implementation from EPiServer CMS 6

So, unless the field _pageGuid has a non-empty value, it will call PermanentLinkMapStore.Find, and we will get the error. Unfortunately, since the setter won’t let us manually set the value without calling Modified(), which will also make external calls, we can’t use it to set the value.

The solution

System.Reflection to the rescue! With a little helper method for setting the private field, I was able to get the test working:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
private static void SetPrivateField<T>( object o, string fieldName, T newValue )
{
Type type = o.GetType();
BindingFlags privateBindings = BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static;
FieldInfo field = type.GetField( fieldName, privateBindings );
field.SetValue( o, newValue );
}

//Mocking code
var page = new PageData();
page.Property.Add( "PageName", new PropertyString( pageName ) );
var propertyPageReference = new PropertyPageReference( new PageReference( 4711) );
SetPrivateField<Guid>( propertyPageReference, "_pageGuid", Guid.NewGuid() );
page.Property.Add( "PageLink", propertyPageReference );

dataFactoryMock.Setup( d => d.GetPage( It.Is<PageReference>( p => p.ID == 4711) ) )
.Returns( page );

And, yay, we have a working test! (Of course, the actual test also had to do a setup for Save, but I’ll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

Finally, there may well be an easier way to do this. If so, I would be most interested to hear of it! Now, I’ll get back to writing unit tests for my project (we still have pretty bad code coverage…). I have a feeling I’ll have to revisit this topic in the future, as more interesting mocking scenarios appear, though.

Powershell makes Windows Server AppFabric tolerable

I have been working quite a bit with Windows Server AppFabric lately, especially the WF Instancing. AppFabric is kind of nice, but unfortunately the GUI inside IIS is mind-numbingly slow! Luckily, there is a better and faster way of querying and working with AppFabric: Powershell.

It turns out that AppFabric comes with a whole bunch of Powershell cmdlets, that allows you to do just about anything you can do in the GUI (and lots of stuff you can’t do in the GUI). If you start Powershell Modules, and type in

1
> Get-Command -Module ApplicationServer

you will get a long list of available commands (or cmdlets).

A long list of available commands

I won’t go in to details, but rather just give you a very useful example of what you can do. When developing workflows, you get a lot of broken workflow instances in your instance store. You often need to find these, and delete them. You can do this in the GUI, of course, but it takes a long time. In Powershell, you can use the commands Get-ASAppServiceInstance and Remove-ASAppServiceInstance. First, we get all the instances for a specific web site:

1
> Get-ASAppServiceInstance -Sitename "Default Web Site"

List of workflow instances

Now, if just want to remove all persisted instances, we can do that by piping the results to Remove-ASAppServiceInstance:

1
> Get-ASAppServiceInstance -Sitename "Default Web Site" | Remove-ASAppServiceInstance

And just like that, all instances are gone! This is just a taste of what you can do, for more info on the commands, check out the documentation on MSDN. It’s still a bit painful to work with AppFabric and WF, but this at least makes it tolerable.